Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 970 based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details | Radeon HD 7870 XT vs GeForce GTX 970 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7.4 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Better 3DMark06 score | 20,070 | vs | 15,071 | Around 35% better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Significantly better PassMark score | 8,563 | vs | 4,420 | Around 95% better PassMark score | |||
More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 6,000 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 925 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 58.8 GPixel/s | vs | 31.2 GPixel/s | Around 90% higher pixel rate | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 224.4 GB/s | vs | 192 GB/s | More than 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly more render output processors | 56 | vs | 32 | 24 more render output processors | |||
Significantly better fire strike factor score | 72.7 | vs | 47.56 | Around 55% better fire strike factor score | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 3,494 GFLOPS | vs | 2,995.2 GFLOPS | More than 15% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,178 MHz | vs | 975 MHz | More than 20% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Better T-Rex score | 8.69 frames/s | vs | 6.37 frames/s | More than 35% better T-Rex score | |||
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 4,375 | vs | 2,460 | Around 80% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Slightly higher texture rate | 109.2 GTexel/s | vs | 93.6 GTexel/s | More than 15% higher texture rate | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,500 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 148W | vs | 185W | 20% lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 980 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 780 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||