Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7870
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7870 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon HD 7870 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7870 vs 750 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon HD 7870GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 23,230 | vs | 5,378 | More than 4.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | Around 80% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 4,339 | vs | 3,699 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 23,592 | vs | 20,401 | More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,560 GFLOPS | vs | 1,728 GFLOPS | Around 50% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 32 GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 95% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 640 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 40 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 50.19 | vs | 33.8 | Around 50% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 25.8 fps | vs | 20.4 fps | More than 25% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,360 | vs | 1,830 | Around 30% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,400 MHz | vs | 4,800 MHz | Around 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 568.19 mInteraction/s | vs | 292.57 mInteraction/s | Around 95% better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 50 | vs | 38.6 | Around 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,200 MHz | More than 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 60W | vs | 175W | 2.9x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7870 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Crysis 3
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $274 | |
| GeForce GTX 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R7 260X vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| Radeon R9 270 vs GeForce GTX 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 vs Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
