0 Comments
| Radeon HD 7870M vs GeForce GTX 765M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,359.38 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Lower TDP | 45W | vs | 75W | 40% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 2,702 | More than 7.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,874 | vs | 1,477 | More than 25% better PassMark score | |||
Higher texture rate | 51 GTexel/s | vs | 32 GTexel/s | Around 60% higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 40 | 24 more texture mapping units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,273 | vs | 934 | More than 35% better PassMark direct compute score |
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7870M vs GeForce GTX 765M
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Radeon HD 7870M
1,477
GeForce GTX 765M
1,874
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Radeon HD 7870M
2,702
GeForce GTX 765M
4,021
3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance
Radeon HD 7870M
2,702
GeForce GTX 765M
19,624
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon HD 7870M
3,359.38
GeForce GTX 765M
3,343.45
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Radeon HD 7870M
3,705.92
GeForce GTX 765M
3,711.62
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Radeon HD 7870M
193.41
GeForce GTX 765M
206.58
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Radeon HD 7870M
934
GeForce GTX 765M
1,273