Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs GeForce GTX 770 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 770GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly higher memory bandwidth | 240 GB/s | vs | 224 GB/s | More than 5% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 256 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| More shading units | 1,792 | vs | 1,536 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Lower TDP | 200W | vs | 230W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,046 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 6,099 | vs | 4,764 | Around 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 134 GTexel/s | vs | 103.6 GTexel/s | Around 30% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher battlefield 4 framerate | 57.5 | vs | 7.5 | Around 7.8x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 925 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 112 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,083 | vs | 2,725 | Around 15% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs GeForce GTX 770
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC
Battlefield 3 (2013) 1920x1080 - Ultra quality + FXAA-HIGH
Battlefield 4
Civilization 5 Texture Decomp (2013) Using the newest graphics cards Civ V can speed screen transitions by reducing texture sizes
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 770 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770 vs R9 280X | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770 vs 760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770 vs 680 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770 vs 780 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770 vs 7970 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
