Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs GeForce GTX 960 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 960GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 240 GB/s | vs | 112.2 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better floating-point performance | 3,315 GFLOPS | vs | 2,308.1 GFLOPS | Around 45% better floating-point performance | |||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Higher texture rate | 103.6 GTexel/s | vs | 72.1 GTexel/s | Around 45% higher texture rate | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 128 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
| More shading units | 1,792 | vs | 1,024 | 768 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 64 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,127 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,813 | vs | 4,764 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,178 MHz | vs | 925 MHz | More than 25% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher battlefield 4 framerate | 58 | vs | 7.5 | Around 7.8x higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
| Lower TDP | 120W | vs | 200W | 40% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 Boost vs GeForce GTX 960
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Battlefield 4
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
