Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7950
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7950 based on its compute performance.
See full details Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 760 |
Released January, 2012
AMD Radeon HD 7950
- 800 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
7.7 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Feb, 2012)AMD's new Tahiti graphics processor introduces a new shader architecture, it is also the first GPU to be produced on a 28 nm process at TSMC.
VS
Released June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
- 980 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Palit has overclocked both GPU and memory on their GTX 760 JetStream out of the box, which provides a nice 6% performance improvement over the reference design.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7950 vs 760
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013), Civilization 5 and Far Cry 3 | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 2 more | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
AMD Radeon HD 7950GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher memory bandwidth | 240 GB/s | vs | 192.3 GB/s | Around 25% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | 18,100 | vs | 228 | Around 79.5x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | |||
| Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 290,444 | vs | 130,616 | Around 2.2x better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,867 GFLOPS | vs | 2,258 GFLOPS | More than 25% better floating-point performance | |||
| More shading units | 1,792 | vs | 1,152 | 640 more shading units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 256 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 24,480 | vs | 16,730 | More than 45% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Quieter load noise level | 50 dB | vs | 53.1 dB | More than 5% quieter load noise level | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher far cry 3 framerate | 41.5 fps | vs | 31.2 fps | Around 35% higher far cry 3 framerate | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 103.4 fps | vs | 84.7 fps | More than 20% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 333.8 | vs | 308.2 | Around 10% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Lower TDP | 170W | vs | 200W | 15% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 760
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC
SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering
Reviews Word on the street
| Radeon HD 7950 | vs | GeForce GTX 760 | ||
 | Radeon HD 7950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 13 comments.
