GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7950 vs 770


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013) and Far Cry 3


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013), PassMark Direct Compute and 1 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its gaming, benchmarks and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7950

Report a correction
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Better T-Rex score 7.65 frames/s vs 3.85 frames/s Around 2x better T-Rex score
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 290,444 vs 164,636 More than 75% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Lower TDP 200W vs 230W Around 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 16,730 More than 75% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 109.5 vs 80.6 More than 35% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better PassMark score 6,147 vs 4,758 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 31,710 Around 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 321W Around 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel/s Around 50% higher texture rate
Quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 53.1 dB More than 10% quieter load noise level
Significantly better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 395 vs 308.2 Around 30% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 40% higher memory clock speed
Quieter idle noise level 38.2 dB vs 40.7 dB More than 5% quieter idle noise level
Slightly higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 25.6 GPixel/s More than 30% higher pixel rate
Higher far cry 3 framerate 50.4 fps vs 31.2 fps More than 60% higher far cry 3 framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 126.2 fps vs 84.7 fps Around 50% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Slightly more energy-efficient idle power consumption 109W vs 112W Around 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 770

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

Radeon HD 7950
349.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
103.77 mHash/s

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

Radeon HD 7950
GeForce GTX 770

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 7950  vs GeForce GTX 770 

The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Read more


Showing 2 comments.
When i stop to spy, dear Juan.
like AMD or Nvidia its same for meeeee. when gtx 770 card launch on indonesia market???
comments powered by Disqus