GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7950 vs 770 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its gaming, benchmarks and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7950

Report a correction
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Better video composition score 97.39 frames/s vs 48.58 frames/s More than 2x better video composition score
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 240 GB/s vs 224 GB/s More than 5% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 290,444 vs 164,636 More than 75% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Slightly more shading units 1,792 vs 1,536 256 more shading units
Lower TDP 200W vs 230W Around 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 321W Around 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 16,730 More than 75% better 3DMark06 score
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 109W vs 112W Around 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 800 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 6,147 vs 4,762 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 31,710 Around 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 9,290 More than 20% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 89.6 GTexel/s Around 50% higher texture rate
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 45 More than 85% higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 395 vs 308.2 Around 30% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 40% higher memory clock speed
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 126.2 fps vs 84.7 fps Around 50% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Slightly higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 25.6 GPixel/s More than 30% higher pixel rate
Slightly more texture mapping units 128 vs 112 16 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
381.93 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
103.87 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
77.84 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
44.67 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
3,719.34
GeForce GTX 770
3,719.29

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 7950  vs GeForce GTX 770 

9.1
9.6
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Read more

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
When i stop to spy, dear Juan.
like AMD or Nvidia its same for meeeee. when gtx 770 card launch on indonesia market???
comments powered by Disqus