GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7950 vs 950 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7950 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7950  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon HD 7950

GPUBoss Winner
Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7950

Report a correction
Much higher memory bandwidth 240 GB/s vs 105.8 GB/s More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 16,730 vs 8,351 More than 2x better 3DMark06 score
Better floating-point performance 2,867.2 GFLOPS vs 1,572.9 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Higher texture rate 89.6 GTexel/s vs 49.2 GTexel/s More than 80% higher texture rate
Significantly more shading units 1,792 vs 768 1024 more shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 112 vs 48 64 more texture mapping units
Much wider memory bus 384 bit vs 128 bit 3x wider memory bus
Better cloud gate factor score 20.6 vs 18.45 More than 10% better cloud gate factor score
Better video composition score 97.05 frames/s vs 66.02 frames/s More than 45% better video composition score
Front view of GeForce GTX 950

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,352.97 vs 1,679.68 Around 2x better T-Rex score
Higher clock speed 1,024 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,612 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 30% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,653 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 30% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher pixel rate 32.8 GPixel/s vs 25.6 GPixel/s Around 30% higher pixel rate
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 48 vs 33.5 Around 45% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Significantly lower TDP 90W vs 200W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 vs GeForce GTX 950

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
382.3 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 950
233.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
78.11 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 950
77.07 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
1,679.68
GeForce GTX 950
3,352.97

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
1,857.58
GeForce GTX 950
3,713.56

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 7950  vs GeForce GTX 950 

9.1
8.3
This power configuration is good for up to 225 W of power draw.
Radeon HD 7950

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus