GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7950 vs 6970 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.3

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7950 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7950  based on its gaming, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7950

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7950

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 31,710 vs 22,250 Around 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 240 GB/s vs 176 GB/s More than 35% higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark score 4,762 vs 3,471 More than 35% better PassMark score
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 290,444 vs 86,512 More than 3.2x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better fire strike factor score 69.56 vs 45.1 Around 55% better fire strike factor score
Better video composition score 98.4 frames/s vs 52.14 frames/s Around 90% better video composition score
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 64 vs 57 More than 10% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 84.7 fps vs 55.1 fps Around 55% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,740 vs 1,378 Around 2x better PassMark direct compute score
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 52.1 fps vs 39.1 fps Around 35% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Slightly more shading units 1,792 vs 1,536 256 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 112 vs 96 16 more texture mapping units
Lower TDP 200W vs 250W 20% lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 6970

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 6970

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 24,035 vs 9,290 More than 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 24,035 vs 16,730 Around 45% better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 880 MHz vs 800 MHz 10% higher clock speed
Slightly higher effective memory clock speed 5,500 MHz vs 5,000 MHz 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,375 MHz vs 1,250 MHz 10% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7950 vs 6970

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
381.93 mHash/s
Radeon HD 6970
273.99 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
77.84 mPixels/s
Radeon HD 6970
18.68 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7950
3,719.34
Radeon HD 6970
3,718.5

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Battlefield 3

Reviews Word on the street

Radeon HD 7950  vs 6970 

9.1
8.2
This power configuration is good for up to 225 W of power draw.
Radeon HD 7950

Comments

comments powered by Disqus