GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 7970 vs 770 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 7970

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7970

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 264 GB/s vs 224 GB/s Around 20% higher memory bandwidth
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Better floating-point performance 3,789 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS Around 20% better floating-point performance
More shading units 2,048 vs 1,536 512 more shading units
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,500 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 925 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Much better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 261.64 frames/s Around 6.2x better ocean surface simulation score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,375 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 118.4 GTexel/s Around 15% higher texture rate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 70.4 fps Around 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Slightly lower TDP 230W vs 250W Around 10% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 7970 vs GeForce GTX 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7970
447.28 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7970
49.05 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7970
261.64 frames/s
GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7970
52.96 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 770
480.54 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 7970
8.62 frames/s
GeForce GTX 770
3.87 frames/s

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street


Showing 25 comments.
my asus 7970 top is running doom 4 @1080 all settings on ultra except shadows which are on good.bloody good card for the money >.>better bang for buck than nvidia
Idiots, this just confirms that AMD doesn't need more gens to beat nVidia. Look, 7xxx is comparing to nVidia 7xx when it is released 2 gens before 7xx, same time as nVidia 5xx generation. Conclusion: nVidia iditos just take gamers money with more generations of GPUs. Period. Same as iPhone and Samsung Galaxy do on smartphones market. For me, it doesn't matter what brand it is about. It's all about how much performance I get for money spent.
rekt nvidia pesant
Lol wow, just noticed that. Yeah, the 7970 TDP Ghz Ed is 250w, GTX 770 is 230w. Blatant misinfo.
But it doesn't , and give less performance sooo.
now nvidia has 900 ti series ati has r9 300 x series. update from low framerate too 4k 5k gaming people. and dont forget dx12 gaming benchmarking in 3dmark 2013.
did you forget the ATI 1xxx and 2xxx and 3xxx? And how the hell does the amount of GPU's made have to do with price vs performance? You are a perfect example of this new dumbed down world!
Now that sucks.I have an HD7970 GHz Edition,but still the info that this site has is rubbish.First of all the 7970 has 1500 MHz memory clock,it has a TDP of 250W in load,it`s a lot quieter(at least with Vapor-X cooling as I have),mine is clocked at 1050 MHz due to GHz Edition thing,and the effective memory clock speed is 6000 MHz,not 5500 MHz.Please make correct comparisons,without favoring Intel + Nvidia.AMD makes good stuff too.
you have to be kidding? how would it bottleneck THEY ARE BRAND NEW
Darn right! Comparing even similar chips like Haswell and Ivy Bridge by hertz is a waste of time. They all do different amounts of work per cycle and therefore make it apples to oranges.
It's not really the Titan Killer, lol.
Because BF4 will be optimised for the AMD cards, therefore it'll be the 7970 that has 70% higher framerate
The 770 gets a 70% higher framerate in BF3... how can you even compare the two!
stop quoting Linus and Elric :D
you should make new 3dmark records with Nvidia forget the games and make the records i never care much about 3dmark it's bullshit...
who else thinks Nvidia is holding out on us their ceo`s were on a month vacation Nvidia does not want amd to go away, they want competition ,the Titan is like 2 YEARS OLD they could have maked a better titan by now.. and BTW all the cores are not unlocked on the TITAN they could easily make a Titan that would have cost around 500$, ,....their GK110 gpu can smoke anything that AMD releases
of course no
Sorry Nvidia, but the 7970 takes it. Especially when it costs 150$ less!
Amd does have the R9 290X Titan Killer coming out soon though.
i have a i5 4670 with gtx 770 sc acx x2 will this rig bottleneck????!!??!?!??!?!?
Resolution might be a factor as well.
but nvidia has been ahead in sheer gaming performance :P so yes amd wins if you make grapohics and 3d animation or multi-screen setups, but a single screen with a single card nvidia is the strongest
that might be because of your cpu and rams also taking a part.
Where did you get that battlefield benchmark for the 7970? mine gets easily over 100fps
comments powered by Disqus