Winner
AMD Radeon HD 7970M
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon HD 7970M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | Radeon HD 7970M vs GeForce GTX 765M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
2.3 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
AMD Radeon HD 7970MGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better PassMark score | 3,781 | vs | 1,874 | More than 2x better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 21,507 | vs | 13,390 | More than 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Better 3DMark06 score | 22,370.5 | vs | 19,624 | Around 15% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 153.6 GB/s | vs | 64.1 GB/s | Around 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,176 GFLOPS | vs | 1,224.2 GFLOPS | Around 80% better floating-point performance | |||
Slightly higher clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better particle simulation score | 306.98 mInteraction/s | vs | 101.59 mInteraction/s | More than 3x better particle simulation score | |||
Higher pixel rate | 27.2 GPixel/s | vs | 12.75 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,800 MHz | vs | 4,008 MHz | Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 20.3 fps | vs | 14.2 fps | Around 45% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 768 | 512 more shading units | |||
Higher texture rate | 68 GTexel/s | vs | 51 GTexel/s | Around 35% higher texture rate | |||
Higher metro: last light framerate | 31 | vs | 18.2 | More than 70% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 43.7 fps | vs | 23.25 fps | Around 90% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Better cloud gate factor score | 20.84 | vs | 15.84 | More than 30% better cloud gate factor score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,970 | vs | 1,273 | Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,200 MHz | vs | 1,002 MHz | Around 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Better T-Rex score | 3,343.45 | vs | 3,339.58 | Almost the same | |||
Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 94.1 fps | Around 20% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 860M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 770M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 760M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 960M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 660M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 950 | ||