Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the IGP Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 520M.

Front view of GeForce GT 520M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 520M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 672 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 2.2x higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs GeForce GT 520M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
1.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 520M
1.34 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
2.4 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 520M
5.38 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
GeForce GT 520M
129.02 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 520M 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Kalindi GF108
Clock speed 300 MHz 672 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 8W 12W

raw performance

Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 520M 
Shading units 128 48
Texture mapping units 8 8
Render output processors 4 4
Pixel rate 1.2 GPixel/s 1.34 GPixel/s
Texture rate 2.4 GTexel/s 5.38 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 76.8 GFLOPS 129.02 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus