Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs GeForce GT 710M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the IGP Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 710M. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 775 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 2.5x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8250 IGP vs GeForce GT 710M
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 8250 IGP | vs | GeForce GT 710M |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Kalindi | GF117 | |
| Clock speed | 300 MHz | 775 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 8W | 15W | |
raw performance | Radeon HD 8250 IGP | vs | GeForce GT 710M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 128 | 96 | |
| Texture mapping units | 8 | 16 | |
| Render output processors | 4 | 8 | |
| Pixel rate | 1.2 GPixel/s | 3.1 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 2.4 GTexel/s | 12.4 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 76.8 GFLOPS | 297.6 GFLOPS |
