Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Report a correction
Lower TDP 8W vs 45W 5.6x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 740M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 740M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 810 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Slightly higher texture rate 25.92 GTexel/s vs 2.4 GTexel/s More than 10.8x higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs GeForce GT 740M 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
1.2 GPixel/s
GeForce GT 740M
6.48 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
2.4 GTexel/s
GeForce GT 740M
25.92 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
GeForce GT 740M
622.1 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 740M 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Kalindi GK107
Clock speed 300 MHz 810 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 8W 45W

raw performance

Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs
GeForce GT 740M 
Shading units 128 384
Texture mapping units 8 32
Render output processors 4 16
Pixel rate 1.2 GPixel/s 6.48 GPixel/s
Texture rate 2.4 GTexel/s 25.92 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 76.8 GFLOPS 622.1 GFLOPS

Read more


comments powered by Disqus