Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 8250 IGP

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 8W vs 18W 2.2x lower TDP
Front view of Radeon HD 6320 IGP

Reasons to consider the
IGP Radeon HD 6320 IGP

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 508 MHz vs 300 MHz Around 70% higher clock speed

Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs 6320 IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
1.2 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 6320 IGP
2.03 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
2.4 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 6320 IGP
4.06 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon HD 8250 IGP
Radeon HD 6320 IGP
81.28 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs
6320 IGP 
GPU name Kalindi Loveland
Clock speed 300 MHz 508 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 8W 18W

raw performance

Radeon HD 8250 IGP  vs
6320 IGP 
Shading units 128 80
Texture mapping units 8 8
Render output processors 4 4
Compute units 2 2
Pixel rate 1.2 GPixel/s 2.03 GPixel/s
Texture rate 2.4 GTexel/s 4.06 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 76.8 GFLOPS 81.28 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus