Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce 920M

Nvidia GeForce 920M

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 8400E

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 8400E

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 25W vs 33W Around 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 1,665.75 More than 2x better T-Rex score
Significantly higher clock speed 954 MHz vs 600 MHz Around 60% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 711 vs 341 More than 2x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Higher effective memory clock speed 1,800 MHz vs 1,066 MHz Around 70% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 30.53 GTexel/s vs 4.8 GTexel/s More than 6.2x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 732.7 GFLOPS vs 192 GFLOPS More than 3.8x better floating-point performance
More render output processors 16 vs 4 12 more render output processors
Significantly higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 533 MHz Around 70% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 32 vs 8 24 more texture mapping units
More shading units 384 vs 160 224 more shading units
Better PassMark direct compute score 648 vs 193 More than 3.2x better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 8400E vs GeForce 920M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 8400E
1,665.75
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce 920M
3,685.69

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus