Radeon HD 8470D IGP vs GeForce 210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | Around 70% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 31W | vs | 65W | 2.1x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8470D IGP vs GeForce 210
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 8470D IGP | vs | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Scrapper | GT216 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 475 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | Nvidia GeForce 210 520 MHz 512 MB | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 65W | 31W | |
raw performance | Radeon HD 8470D IGP | vs | GeForce 210 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 192 | 16 | |
| Texture mapping units | 12 | 8 | |
| Render output processors | 4 | 4 | |
| Pixel rate | 3.2 GPixel/s | 1.9 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 9.6 GTexel/s | 3.8 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 307.2 GFLOPS | 35.2 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 8400 GS | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | $55 | |
| 210 vs 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | $98 | |
| 210 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 8800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
