Radeon HD 8570D IGP vs GeForce GTX 660 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 65W | vs | 130W | 2x lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 409.6 GFLOPS | Around 4.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 12.8 GTexel/s | Around 6.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 16 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 19.75 GPixel/s | vs | 6.4 GPixel/s | More than 3x higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 256 | 896 more shading units | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8570D IGP vs GeForce GTX 660
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 8570D IGP | vs | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Devastator | GK104 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 823 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 868 MHz | 888 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 980 MHz 2 GB | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 65W | 130W | |
raw performance | Radeon HD 8570D IGP | vs | GeForce GTX 660 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 256 | 1,152 | |
| Texture mapping units | 16 | 96 | |
| Render output processors | 8 | 32 | |
| Pixel rate | 6.4 GPixel/s | 19.75 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 12.8 GTexel/s | 79 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 409.6 GFLOPS | 1,896.2 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $200 | $274 | |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | $98 | |
| 660 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| 660 vs 1030 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
