GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 8750M vs 730M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

5.9

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 730M  based on its gaming.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon HD 8750M

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 8750M

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,000 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 64 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better PassMark score 1,041 vs 810 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better manhattan score 3,702.39 vs 2,992.38 Around 25% better manhattan score
Better particle simulation score 138.35 mInteraction/s vs 92.42 mInteraction/s Around 50% better particle simulation score
Higher memory clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 730M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 730M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 10,884 vs 8,727 Around 25% better 3DMark06 score
Higher clock speed 719 MHz vs 620 MHz More than 15% higher clock speed
Significantly higher hitman: absolution framerate 7.4 vs 6 Around 25% higher hitman: absolution framerate
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 49.41 fps vs 30.8 fps More than 60% higher diablo III framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon HD 8750M vs GeForce GT 730M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 8750M
70.6 mHash/s
GeForce GT 730M
30.63 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 8750M
8.27 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 730M
7.81 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 8750M
3,348.61
GeForce GT 730M
3,365.34

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon HD 8750M
3,702.39
GeForce GT 730M
2,992.38

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
What is not included here is that depending on the core and memory clock settings of the OEM's, the HD 8750M can achieve a much higher score of P2515, P2662, on 3DMARK11 and P9764 on 3DMARK06 as per OEM settings tested by Notebookcheck. For the GPU Adventurer, the HD can also be even further overclocked with the MSI Afterburner Program to much-much higher levels of performance, easily achieving medium/high levels with an enjoyable 40+ fps of gameplay on Alan Wake. The GT730M is already fully optimized, as per NVIDIA: 'We've spent some additional time tuning the drivers for performance over a 64-bit bus on these chips.' And overclocking them will bring minimal results. This should be brought to the table.
Just fixed this, thanks for the heads up Daniel. And sorry for the delay, must not have seen this before.
You still have your 3dmark06 and 3dmark11 scores swapped; it's been months now! No way ever in any parallel universe would an HD8750 receive P8,727 in 3DMARK 11! :) Crazy if it did, it would even whoop a GTX680! So fix this misleading blunder, people! We're out here trying to take your website seriously, but you's makin' it hard to believe in you's!
comments powered by Disqus