Radeon HD 8950M vs GeForce GTX 765M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly more shading units | 896 | vs | 768 | 128 more shading units | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 797 MHz | vs | 700 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon HD 8950M vs GeForce GTX 765M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon HD 8950M | vs | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Saturn | GK106 | |
| Market | Laptop | Laptop | |
| Clock speed | 700 MHz | 797 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 896 | 768 | |
| Texture mapping units | 56 | 64 | |
| Render output processors | 16 | 16 | |
| Pixel rate | 11.2 GPixel/s | 12.75 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 39.2 GTexel/s | 51 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,254 GFLOPS | 1,224.2 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon HD 8950M | vs | GeForce GTX 765M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 1,002 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | 4,008 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 128 bit | 128 bit | |
| Memory | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 | |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 64.1 GB/s |
