GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro 455 vs 960M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro 455

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro 455

Report a correction
Lower TDP 35W vs 75W 2.1x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Slightly better T-Rex score 3.69 frames/s vs 2.85 frames/s Around 30% better T-Rex score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro 455 vs GeForce GTX 960M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 455
163.13 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960M
174.61 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 455
33.49 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 455
573.73 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.15 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 455
284.35 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
578.58 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 455
2.85 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
3.69 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 455
44.99 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
51.98 frames/s

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus