GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro 460 vs 960M among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro 460

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro 460

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 3,492 vs 2,043 More than 70% better PassMark score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
More shading units 1,024 vs 640 384 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 40 24 more texture mapping units
Lower TDP 35W vs 75W 2.1x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,097 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 910 MHz Around 30% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly better ocean surface simulation score 795.24 frames/s vs 594.91 frames/s Around 35% better ocean surface simulation score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro 460 vs GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 460
226.93 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 960M
174.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 460
44.09 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
54.29 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 460
594.91 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.24 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 460
313.56 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
578.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 460
3.46 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
3.69 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 460
55.75 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
51.97 frames/s

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus