GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro 555 vs 755M Mac among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro 555

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro 555

Report a correction
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Better face detection score 31.3 mPixels/s vs 10.24 mPixels/s More than 3x better face detection score
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Front view of GeForce GT 755M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M Mac

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 850 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 100W 2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro 555 vs GeForce GT 755M Mac

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
162.71 mHash/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
19.14 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
31.3 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
10.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
572.79 frames/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
393.81 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
271 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
143 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
2.83 frames/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
0.97 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
26.39 frames/s
GeForce GT 755M Mac
18.79 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus