GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro 555 vs 1060 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.8

Overall Score

Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060 

GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

MSI GeForce GTX 1060

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro 555

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro 555

Report a correction
Lower TDP 100W vs 120W More than 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 1060

Reasons to consider the
MSI GeForce GTX 1060

Report a correction
Much better PassMark score 8,686 vs 3,124 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
Much higher clock speed 1,544 MHz vs 850 MHz More than 80% higher clock speed
More memory 6,144 MB vs 2,048 MB 3x more memory
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 8,008 MHz vs 5,100 MHz More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher pixel rate 74.1 GPixel/s vs 13.6 GPixel/s Around 5.5x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 192.2 GB/s vs 81.6 GB/s More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 3,953 GFLOPS vs 1,305.6 GFLOPS More than 3x better floating-point performance
Much better manhattan score 3,717.98 vs 1,811.89 More than 2x better manhattan score
Higher texture rate 123.5 GTexel/s vs 40.8 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
Significantly more render output processors 48 vs 16 Three times as many render output processors
Significantly better face detection score 118.74 mPixels/s vs 31.29 mPixels/s More than 3.8x better face detection score
Much better PassMark direct compute score 5,049 vs 1,411 More than 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 2,002 MHz vs 1,275 MHz More than 55% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,280 vs 768 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 80 vs 48 32 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro 555 vs GeForce GTX 1060

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
163.26 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1060
464.97 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
31.29 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1060
118.74 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
571.48 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,349.8 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
270.13 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1060
1,197.31 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
2.83 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
8.9 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
26.9 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1060
110.74 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
3,340.63
GeForce GTX 1060
3,358.62

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
1,811.89
GeForce GTX 1060
3,717.98

Comments

comments powered by Disqus