Winner
MSI GeForce GTX 1060
GPUBoss recommends the MSI GeForce GTX 1060 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | Radeon Pro 555 vs GeForce GTX 1060 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.7 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | MSI GeForce GTX 1060GPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Slightly lower TDP | 100W | vs | 120W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 1,544 MHz | vs | 850 MHz | More than 80% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 8,686 | vs | 3,124 | More than 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
More memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 3x more memory | |||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 5,100 MHz | More than 55% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly higher pixel rate | 74.1 GPixel/s | vs | 13.6 GPixel/s | Around 5.5x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 81.6 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better floating-point performance | 3,953 GFLOPS | vs | 1,305.6 GFLOPS | More than 3x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 123.5 GTexel/s | vs | 40.8 GTexel/s | More than 3x higher texture rate | |||
Significantly more render output processors | 48 | vs | 16 | Three times as many render output processors | |||
Significantly better T-Rex score | 8.68 frames/s | vs | 2.83 frames/s | More than 3x better T-Rex score | |||
Much better PassMark direct compute score | 5,049 | vs | 1,411 | More than 3.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,275 MHz | More than 55% higher memory clock speed | |||
More shading units | 1,280 | vs | 768 | 512 more shading units | |||
More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 48 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
Better manhattan score | 3,717.62 | vs | 1,811.89 | More than 2x better manhattan score |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 480 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1070 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 980 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 570 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||