GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro 555 vs 660M Mac among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro 555

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro 555

Report a correction
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Better face detection score 31.3 mPixels/s vs 11.24 mPixels/s More than 2.8x better face detection score
Front view of GeForce GTX 660M Mac

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660M Mac

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 950 MHz vs 850 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 100W 2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro 555 vs GeForce GTX 660M Mac

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
162.71 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660M Mac
16.56 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
31.3 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660M Mac
11.24 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
572.79 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660M Mac
301.55 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
271 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 660M Mac
123.43 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
2.83 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660M Mac
0.78 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 555
26.39 frames/s
GeForce GTX 660M Mac
16.08 frames/s

Comments

comments powered by Disqus