GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro 560 vs MX150 among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

AMD Radeon Pro 560 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Pro 560  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro 560

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro 560

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 81.6 GB/s vs 48.06 GB/s Around 70% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,894.4 GFLOPS vs 1,127 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,024 vs 384 640 more shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 24 40 more texture mapping units
Slightly higher texture rate 59.2 GTexel/s vs 35.23 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Front view of GeForce MX150

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce MX150

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 925 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,100 MHz Around 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,275 MHz Around 20% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 30W vs 75W 2.5x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro 560 vs GeForce MX150

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 560
GeForce MX150

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro 560
GeForce MX150

Read more


comments powered by Disqus