GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro Duo vs TITAN X among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

9.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro Duo

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro Duo

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much better floating-point performance 16,384 GFLOPS vs 6,144 GFLOPS Around 2.8x better floating-point performance
Much higher texture rate 512 GTexel/s vs 192 GTexel/s Around 2.8x higher texture rate
Many more shading units 8,192 vs 3,072 5120 more shading units
Many more texture mapping units 512 vs 192 320 more texture mapping units
Much wider memory bus 8,192 bit vs 384 bit More than 21.2x wider memory bus
Higher pixel rate 128 GPixel/s vs 96 GPixel/s Around 35% higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 128 vs 96 32 more render output processors
Front view of GeForce GTX TITAN X

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX TITAN X

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly more memory 12,288 MB vs 8,192 MB 50% more memory
Better PassMark score 10,703 vs 9,104 Around 20% better PassMark score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 500 MHz More than 3.5x higher memory clock speed
Better particle simulation score 1,365.44 mInteraction/s vs 994.11 mInteraction/s More than 35% better particle simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 6,287 vs 5,201 More than 20% better PassMark direct compute score
Significantly lower TDP 250W vs 350W Around 30% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro Duo vs GeForce GTX TITAN X

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Duo
820.1 mHash/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
305.8 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Duo
136.5 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
132.11 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Duo
3,507.93 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
1,721.54 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Duo
994.11 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
1,365.44 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Duo
13.08 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
9.47 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Duo
146.52 frames/s
GeForce GTX TITAN X
39.55 frames/s

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

Showing 25 comments.
If iam is amd, i will use my fiji core, make it with 16NM architecture and clock it at 1.5 Ghz with two chip at one board, now all nvidia chip is die, the weak point only is the power consuption is still 350w
Check this out... 1chip > 2 chips... xDDD nVidia supreme leader! http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid=3605&gid2=3082&compare=geforce-gtx-titan-p-12gb-vs-radeon-pro-duo-8gb
http://www.game-debate.com/gpu/index.php?gid=3605&gid2=3082&compare=geforce-gtx-titan-p-12gb-vs-radeon-pro-duo-8gb
Pff Bus Width: TITAN 384 bit vs AMD 4096 bit x2 Bye clock & memory
Lol, best bench ever...
http://hwbench.com/vgas/geforce-gtx-titan-x-pascal-vs-radeon-pro-duo xD
ik they always give nvidia preference for noise and power they dont understand we want raw power
Pffffff, NEW TitanX (Pascal)! GG AMD, haahaha, noob!
Ha...they cherry picked the benchmarks so the Titan X won't look that bad, and they didn't even announce the Pro Duo as the winner. gpuboss are a bunch of nvidia sellouts
gg izi- AMD
Well, Pascal GTX 1080 DOES have benchmarks now and it IS FASTER than the the Titan X in gaming. I still don't know shit about the 1080's computation.
xD
The Titan Z also has two GPUs...
28nm
I agree but will see who wins:) but your right we didnt saw the banchmark but well see
when it comes to that its mainly software base but dont get me wrong alot of horsepower needs to go with it, the pro duo and titan x both have built in technologys/softwares for professional work like that though whether its used depends on what programs your using as some dont support amd and others dont support nvidia, so if you get the right editing software or whatever the pro duo is the obvious option here
Whatever happened to the 990 TI? Now you're talking about the 1000 series... Also, the Pro Duo and the 1080 is no competition. 1080 won't beat Titan X just yet. Pro Duo beats Titan X in computation. Also, Pascal has NO BENCHMARKS YET. I wouldn't start assuming until you see actual proof.
remember that AMD has two GPUs and Nvidia only one
Maybe in yours my friend with the new 1000 series from nvidia will turn amd to dust read sbout the new pascal my friend.
ust wait until POLARIS GPU flagships release
in your dreams if your 990ti will ever released AMD FURY X2 and radeon 400 series will turn your graphics card into DUST
Nope, just a pair of Fiji GPUs as seen in R9 Fury X etc
This isn't polaris, just a pair of Fiji GPUs, they've binned the chips much better using the lowest consumption chips to keep the board power down.
When the new 990 ti will come out it will crash AMD
in the professional visual effects animation world which graphics card is better?
comments powered by Disqus