0 Comments
| Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 980 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly better floating-point performance | 9,677 GFLOPS | vs | 4,981 GFLOPS | Around 95% better floating-point performance | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More memory | 8,196 MB | vs | 4,096 MB | More than 2x more memory | |||
Significantly higher texture rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | vs | 155.6 GTexel/s | Around 95% higher texture rate | |||
Higher clock speed | 1,250 MHz | vs | 1,127 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 256 bit | 8x wider memory bus | |||
Significantly more shading units | 3,584 | vs | 2,048 | 1536 more shading units | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 128 | 96 more texture mapping units | |||
Slightly higher pixel rate | 86.4 GPixel/s | vs | 77.82 GPixel/s | More than 10% higher pixel rate | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | vs | 1,216 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 1,560 MHz | Around 4.5x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Much higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | Around 2.2x higher memory clock speed |
Features Key features of the Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 980
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
Radeon Pro Vega 56
86.4 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 980
77.82 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
Radeon Pro Vega 56
302.4 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 980
155.6 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
Radeon Pro Vega 56
9,677 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 980
4,981 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
Radeon Pro Vega 56
3,584
GeForce GTX 980
2,048
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
GeForce GTX 980
128
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | vs | GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
GPU name | Vega 10 | GM204 | |
Clock speed | 1,250 MHz | 1,127 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | 1,216 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 3,584 | 2,048 | |
Texture mapping units | 224 | 128 | |
Render output processors | 64 | 64 | |
Pixel rate | 86.4 GPixel/s | 77.82 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | 155.6 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 9,677 GFLOPS | 4,981 GFLOPS |
memory | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | vs | GeForce GTX 980 |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 780 MHz | 1,753 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 1,560 MHz | 7,012 MHz | |
Memory bus | 2,048 bit | 256 bit | |
Memory | 8,196 MB | 4,096 MB | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 175W | 165W |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs TITAN | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
980 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs R9 390X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs 980 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs R9 290X | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||