Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs 580 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 9,677 GFLOPS | vs | 6,175 GFLOPS | More than 55% better floating-point performance | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 86.4 GPixel/s | vs | 42.9 GPixel/s | More than 2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | vs | 193 GTexel/s | More than 55% higher texture rate | |||
| Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 256 bit | 8x wider memory bus | |||
| Significantly more render output processors | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 3,584 | vs | 2,304 | 1280 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 224 | vs | 144 | 80 more texture mapping units | |||
| More compute units | 56 | vs | 36 | 20 more compute units | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,000 MHz | vs | 1,560 MHz | Around 5.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,000 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | More than 2.5x higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 150W | vs | 175W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs 580
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
compute units Discrete cores within the GPU
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | vs | 580 |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | AMD | |
| GPU name | Vega 10 | Polaris 20 | |
| Clock speed | 1,250 MHz | 1,257 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | 1,340 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 3,584 | 2,304 | |
| Texture mapping units | 224 | 144 | |
| Render output processors | 64 | 32 | |
| Compute units | 56 | 36 | |
| Pixel rate | 86.4 GPixel/s | 42.9 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 302.4 GTexel/s | 193 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 9,677 GFLOPS | 6,175 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon Pro Vega 56 | vs | 580 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 780 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,560 MHz | 8,000 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 2,048 bit | 256 bit | |
| Memory | 8,196 MB | 8,192 MB | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 175W | 150W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $280 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs Radeon RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
