Winner
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 based on its .
See full details Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
First seen on June, 2017
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- 1.2 GHz
- 16 GB
8.3 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2017)So, if you have 16GB of RAM you could dedicate 4-6GB of it, so it would - in a way - combine with the 8GB of HBM2 for up to 14GB of VRAM.
VS
Released March, 2017
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- 1.5 GHz
- 11 GB GDDR5
9.7 Out of 10
by www.tweaktown.com (Mar, 2017)Performance (overclocking, power)100%Quality (build, design, cooling)100%General Features (display outputs, etc)100%Bundle, Packaging & Software100% Overall TweakTown Rating100% The Bottom Line: NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 1080 Ti is the most amazing graphics card to come in a very long time, offering $1200 performance from the Titan X for just $699.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro Vega 64 vs 1080 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 9.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more memory | 16,384 MB | vs | 11,264 MB | More than 45% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 352 bit | More than 5.8x wider memory bus | |||
| More shading units | 4,096 | vs | 3,584 | 512 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 224 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Lower TDP | 225W | vs | 250W | 10% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 11,008 MHz | vs | 1,560 MHz | More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,480 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 139.2 GPixel/s | vs | 86.4 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 88 | vs | 64 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Better video composition score | 161.38 frames/s | vs | 111.38 frames/s | Around 45% better video composition score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,582 MHz | vs | 1,350 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,376 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | More than 75% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $286 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $286 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $286 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| RX 580 vs 1070 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
