Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
First seen on June, 2017
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64
- 1.2 GHz
- 16 GB
by www.tweaktown.com (Aug, 2017)So, if you have 16GB of RAM you could dedicate 4-6GB of it, so it would - in a way - combine with the 8GB of HBM2 for up to 14GB of VRAM.
VS
Released March, 2017
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
- 1.5 GHz
- 11 GB GDDR5
by www.tweaktown.com (Apr, 2017)For those with a 21:9 aspect display and native 3440x1440 resolution, in our testing the AORUS GTX 1080 Ti 11G can handle 80-100FPS without a problem, which is perfect for the 100Hz UltraWide gaming monitors on the market.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more memory | 16,384 MB | vs | 11,264 MB | More than 45% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much wider memory bus | 2,048 bit | vs | 352 bit | More than 5.8x wider memory bus | |||
| More shading units | 4,096 | vs | 3,584 | 512 more shading units | |||
| More texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 224 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| Lower TDP | 225W | vs | 250W | 10% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 11,008 MHz | vs | 1,560 MHz | More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,480 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 139.2 GPixel/s | vs | 86.4 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| More render output processors | 88 | vs | 64 | 24 more render output processors | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,582 MHz | vs | 1,350 MHz | More than 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,376 MHz | vs | 780 MHz | More than 75% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
effective memory clock speed Frequency at which memory can be read from and written to
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | vs | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | Nvidia | |
| GPU name | Vega 10 | GP102 | |
| Clock speed | 1,250 MHz | 1,480 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,350 MHz | 1,582 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
| Shading units | 4,096 | 3,584 | |
| Texture mapping units | 256 | 224 | |
| Render output processors | 64 | 88 | |
| Pixel rate | 86.4 GPixel/s | 139.2 GPixel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 11,059 GFLOPS | 11,340 GFLOPS | |
memory | Radeon Pro Vega 64 | vs | GeForce GTX 1080 Ti |
|---|---|---|---|
| Memory clock speed | 780 MHz | 1,376 MHz | |
| Effective memory clock speed | 1,560 MHz | 11,008 MHz | |
| Memory bus | 2,048 bit | 352 bit | |
| Memory | 16,384 MB | 11,264 MB | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 225W | 250W | |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| RX Vega 64 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| TITAN X vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 1070 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 980 Ti vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $347 | ||
| 1060 vs 1080 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 1080 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| MX150 vs 1050 | ||
 | VS | |
| $347 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $347 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $347 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
