GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro Vega 64 vs 1080 Ti among all GPUs

Gaming

Radeon Pro Vega 64
n.d.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
n.d.
GeForce GTX 1080
9.8
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

Radeon Pro Vega 64
n.d.
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
8.7
GeForce GTX 1080
6.9
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Radeon Pro Vega 64
8.5
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
8.9
GeForce GTX 1080
8.9
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Radeon Pro Vega 64
7.1
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
7.0
GeForce GTX 1080
7.7
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

Radeon Pro Vega 64
7.1
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
6.7
GeForce GTX 1080
7.7
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8.5

Overall Score

Radeon Pro Vega 64
8.3
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
8.5
GeForce GTX 1080
8.4

Winner
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Front view of Radeon Pro Vega 64
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro Vega 64

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

Report a correction
Significantly more memory 16,384 MB vs 11,264 MB More than 45% more memory
Much wider memory bus 2,048 bit vs 352 bit More than 5.8x wider memory bus
Significantly better video composition score 111.38 frames/s vs 23.75 frames/s Around 4.8x better video composition score
More shading units 4,096 vs 3,584 512 more shading units
More texture mapping units 256 vs 224 32 more texture mapping units
Lower TDP 225W vs 250W 10% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 11,008 MHz vs 1,560 MHz More than 7x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher clock speed 1,480 MHz vs 1,250 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly higher pixel rate 139.2 GPixel/s vs 86.4 GPixel/s More than 60% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 88 vs 64 24 more render output processors
Higher turbo clock speed 1,582 MHz vs 1,350 MHz More than 15% higher turbo clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,376 MHz vs 780 MHz More than 75% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro Vega 64 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Vega 64
1,396.17 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
1,388.77 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Vega 64
142.69 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
200.41 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Vega 64
1,729.56 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2,438.23 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Vega 64
1,125.49 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
1,730.25 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Vega 64
12.69 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
21.02 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon Pro Vega 64
111.38 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
23.75 frames/s

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Cbed (04:33 PM, August 4, 2017)
I'm going to have to read up on how Nvidia is getting a 8x boost in effective memory over the actual memory clock compared to AMD's 2x Boost. That's pretty interesting.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss