GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro WX 3100 vs 1050 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro WX 3100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,354 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Higher pixel rate 46.56 GPixel/s vs 19.5 GPixel/s Around 2.5x higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,455 MHz vs 1,219 MHz Around 20% higher turbo clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 2,863 vs 2,436 Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1050

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus