GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro WX 3100 vs 1050 Ti among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro WX 3100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 65W vs 75W Around 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,291 MHz vs 925 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 5,757 vs 3,774 Around 55% better PassMark score
Higher pixel rate 41.3 GPixel/s vs 19.5 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,983 GFLOPS vs 1,248.3 GFLOPS Around 60% better floating-point performance
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher turbo clock speed 1,392 MHz vs 1,219 MHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly higher texture rate 62 GTexel/s vs 39 GTexel/s Around 60% higher texture rate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,271 vs 2,436 Around 35% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro WX 3100 vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


comments powered by Disqus