GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pro WX 4100 vs Pro WX 3100 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon Pro WX 4100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,125 MHz vs 925 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,459.6 GFLOPS vs 1,248.3 GFLOPS More than 95% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 76.9 GTexel/s vs 39 GTexel/s More than 95% higher texture rate
More shading units 1,024 vs 512 Twice as many shading units
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
More compute units 16 vs 8 Twice as many compute units
Front view of Radeon Pro WX 3100

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

Report a correction
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 6,000 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,750 MHz vs 1,500 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Better manhattan score 3,602.61 vs 1,854.65 Around 95% better manhattan score

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs 3100

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus