Winner
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 710 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details Radeon R5 220 vs GeForce GT 710 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 220 vs 710 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.3 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GT 710GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R5 220 vs the Nvidia GeForce GT 710. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 954 MHz | vs | 650 MHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,800 MHz | vs | 1,066 MHz | Around 70% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 900 MHz | vs | 533 MHz | Around 70% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 61.38 | vs | 24.04 | More than 2.5x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 523 | vs | 78 | Around 6.8x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 220 vs GeForce GT 710
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $98 | ||
| 710 vs 730 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $55 | ||
| 710 vs 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 710 vs 1030 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 710 vs 210 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 710 vs R5 230 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 710 vs R7 240 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $107 | ||
| 710 vs 630 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
