Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 625 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,334 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 667 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce 210 vs the Sapphire Radeon R5 230. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 8400 GS | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | $55 | |
| 210 vs 610 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | $98 | |
| 210 vs 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| R5 230 vs 710 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
