Winner
Sapphire Radeon R5 230
GPUBoss recommends the Sapphire Radeon R5 230 based on its .
See full details Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210 |
Released April, 2014
Sapphire Radeon R5 230
- 625 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.1 Out of 10
by hassan-mujtaba (Oct, 2013)The GPU core clock is maintained at 1000 MHz and the boost clock is configured at 1050 MHz.
VS
Released September, 2009
Nvidia GeForce 210
- 475 MHz
- 1 GB DDR2
4.2 Out of 10
by Usman-Pirzada (Jul, 2013)This 3W is equal to Intel’s SDP calculation which for the Haswell Fanless SoC is 4.5W. The GX-210JA will support an impressive 1Ghz Clock Speed.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 230 vs 210 among Desktop GPUs for under $200
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 5.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 625 MHz | vs | 475 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 1,334 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | More than 65% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 667 MHz | vs | 400 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce 210 vs the Sapphire Radeon R5 230. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Features Key features of the Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce 210
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| R5 230 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $98 | |
| R5 230 vs 730 | ||
 | VS | |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 710 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 5450 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 9500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 8400 GS | ||
| | VS |  |
| $54 | ||
| 210 vs 9800 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $292 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $292 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $292 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
