GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 230 vs 1030 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.5

Overall Score

Winner
Sapphire Radeon R5 230 

GPUBoss recommends the Sapphire Radeon R5 230  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 230

Reasons to consider the
Sapphire Radeon R5 230

Report a correction
Slightly lower TDP 19W vs 30W More than 35% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GT 1030

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 1030

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 1,227 MHz vs 625 MHz More than 95% higher clock speed
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 1,334 MHz More than 4.5x higher effective memory clock speed
Much better manhattan score 3,707.98 vs 653.95 Around 5.8x better manhattan score
Much higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 667 MHz More than 2.2x higher memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 48.06 GB/s vs 10.7 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 1,127 GFLOPS vs 200 GFLOPS Around 5.8x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 35.23 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel/s More than 7x higher texture rate
Slightly higher pixel rate 11.74 GPixel/s vs 2.5 GPixel/s Around 4.8x higher pixel rate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 230 vs GeForce GT 1030

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 230
1,206.86
GeForce GT 1030
3,344.69

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 230
653.95
GeForce GT 1030
3,707.98

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus