Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 240

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 730 MHz vs 450 MHz More than 60% higher clock speed
More shading units 320 vs 8 312 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction
Lower TDP 12W vs 50W 4.2x lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon R5 240  vs GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R5 240
6.24 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R5 240
15.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R5 240
499.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R5 240  vs
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Oland MCP79MX
Clock speed 730 MHz 450 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 50W 12W

raw performance

Radeon R5 240  vs
GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 320 8
Texture mapping units 20 8
Render output processors 8 4
Pixel rate 6.24 GPixel/s 1.8 GPixel/s
Texture rate 15.6 GTexel/s 3.6 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 499.2 GFLOPS 17.6 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus