Radeon R5 340 vs GeForce GTX 1060 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 65W | vs | 120W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 1,544 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 95% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 8,008 MHz | vs | 4,500 MHz | Around 80% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | vs | 72 GB/s | Around 2.8x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly more memory | 6,144 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 3x more memory | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 3,953 GFLOPS | vs | 633.6 GFLOPS | Around 6.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher pixel rate | 74.1 GPixel/s | vs | 6.6 GPixel/s | Around 11.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 123.5 GTexel/s | vs | 19.8 GTexel/s | Around 6.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,759 MHz | vs | 825 MHz | Around 2.2x higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Many more render output processors | 48 | vs | 8 | 40 more render output processors | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 2,002 MHz | vs | 1,125 MHz | Around 80% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Much better PassMark direct compute score | 5,049 | vs | 1,231 | More than 4x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,280 | vs | 384 | 896 more shading units | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 24 | 56 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 340 vs GeForce GTX 1060
PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Features Key features of the Radeon R5 340 vs GeForce GTX 1060
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 480 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1070 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 980 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 960 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
