Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 340X

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 340X

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 686 MHz More than 45% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz vs 685 MHz Around 55% higher turbo clock speed
Front view of Radeon HD 7660G IGP

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon HD 7660G IGP

Report a correction
Lower TDP 35W vs 65W More than 45% lower TDP

Features Key features of the Radeon R5 340X  vs HD 7660G IGP 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R5 340X
8.4 GPixel/s
Radeon HD 7660G IGP
5.49 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R5 340X
25.2 GTexel/s
Radeon HD 7660G IGP
16.5 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R5 340X
806.4 GFLOPS
Radeon HD 7660G IGP
526.8 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

compute units Discrete cores within the GPU

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R5 340X  vs
HD 7660G IGP 
GPU name Oland Devastator
Clock speed 1,000 MHz 686 MHz
Turbo clock speed 1,050 MHz 685 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 65W 35W

raw performance

Radeon R5 340X  vs
HD 7660G IGP 
Shading units 384 384
Texture mapping units 24 24
Render output processors 8 8
Compute units 6 6
Pixel rate 8.4 GPixel/s 5.49 GPixel/s
Texture rate 25.2 GTexel/s 16.5 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 806.4 GFLOPS 526.8 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus