Radeon R5 340X vs HD 7660G IGP |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 686 MHz | More than 45% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | vs | 685 MHz | Around 55% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 35W | vs | 65W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Radeon R5 340X vs HD 7660G IGP
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
compute units Discrete cores within the GPU
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | Radeon R5 340X | vs | HD 7660G IGP |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPU brand | AMD | AMD | |
| GPU name | Oland | Devastator | |
| Clock speed | 1,000 MHz | 686 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 1,050 MHz | 685 MHz | |
| Is dual GPU | No | No | |
| Reference card | None | None | |
noise and power | |||
| TDP | 65W | 35W | |
raw performance | Radeon R5 340X | vs | HD 7660G IGP |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shading units | 384 | 384 | |
| Texture mapping units | 24 | 24 | |
| Render output processors | 8 | 8 | |
| Compute units | 6 | 6 | |
| Pixel rate | 8.4 GPixel/s | 5.49 GPixel/s | |
| Texture rate | 25.2 GTexel/s | 16.5 GTexel/s | |
| Floating-point performance | 806.4 GFLOPS | 526.8 GFLOPS |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| Radeon RX 580 vs GeForce GTX 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
