Winner
Nvidia GeForce 820M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 820M based on its gaming and benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce 820M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M230 vs 820M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce 820MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 4x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 825 MHz | vs | 625 MHz | More than 30% higher clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 320 | vs | 96 | 224 more shading units | |||
| Slightly better particle simulation score | 110.85 mInteraction/s | vs | 74.26 mInteraction/s | Around 50% better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,000 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,533.46 | vs | 1,802.63 | More than 95% better manhattan score | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,518 | vs | 5,145 | More than 45% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 33.9 fps | vs | 16.85 fps | More than 2x higher diablo III framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M230 vs GeForce 820M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 740M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 840M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 920M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| 720M vs 820M | ||
 | VS | |
| R7 M265 vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 740M vs R5 M230 | ||
| | VS | |
| 840M vs R5 M230 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
