Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS
Front view of GeForce 920M

Nvidia GeForce 920M

GPUBoss Winner

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M240

Report a correction
Slightly higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 954 MHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Front view of GeForce 920M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 920M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,003.5 vs 5,698 Around 60% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Better T-Rex score 3,358.92 vs 3,357.14 Almost the same
Slightly more texture mapping units 32 vs 20 12 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce 920M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M240
3,357.14
GeForce 920M
3,358.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M240
1,629.63
GeForce 920M
3,685.69

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Comments

comments powered by Disqus