Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M240

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M240

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,000 MHz vs 700 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 470

Reasons to consider the
GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 470

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,622 vs 1,588 Around 14.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 3,607 vs 521 Around 7x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 15,350 vs 4,761 Around 3.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 133.9 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 9.2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 3,348 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 85% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly more render output processors 40 vs 8 32 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 19.6 GPixel/s vs 8.24 GPixel/s Around 2.5x higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 56 vs 20 36 more texture mapping units
Better manhattan score 3,706.15 vs 1,654.35 Around 2.2x better manhattan score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,340 vs 502 Around 2.8x better PassMark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 320 bit vs 64 bit 5x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M240 vs GeForce GTX 470

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M240
3,357.14
GeForce GTX 470
3,353.44

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M240
1,654.35
GeForce GTX 470
3,706.15

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus