Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 610 |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 955 MHz | vs | 738 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Slightly better PassMark score | 582 | vs | 354 | Around 65% better PassMark score | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 659.2 GFLOPS | vs | 141.7 GFLOPS | Around 4.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 8.24 GPixel/s | vs | 1.48 GPixel/s | More than 5.5x higher pixel rate | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 20.6 GTexel/s | vs | 5.9 GTexel/s | Around 3.5x higher texture rate | |||
| More shading units | 320 | vs | 48 | 272 more shading units | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 20 | vs | 8 | 12 more texture mapping units | |||
| |||||||
| Slightly lower TDP | 12W | vs | 18W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 610
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
Features Key features of the Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 610
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 970 | ||
