Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M330

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M330

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 955 MHz vs 400 MHz Around 2.5x higher clock speed
Slightly more shading units 320 vs 16 304 more shading units
Front view of GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Reasons to consider the
Intel GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel vs the AMD Radeon R5 M330.

Features Key features of the Radeon R5 M330  vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel 

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

Radeon R5 M330
8.24 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

Radeon R5 M330
20.6 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

Radeon R5 M330
659.2 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

render output processors GPU commponents responsible for transform pixels as they flow between memory buffers

Specifications Full list of technical specs


Radeon R5 M330  vs
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel 
GPU brand AMD Nvidia
GPU name Exo MCP79
Clock speed 955 MHz 400 MHz
Is dual GPU No No
Reference card None None

noise and power

TDP 18W 12W

raw performance

Radeon R5 M330  vs
GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel 
Shading units 320 16
Texture mapping units 20 8
Render output processors 8 4
Pixel rate 8.24 GPixel/s 1.6 GPixel/s
Texture rate 20.6 GTexel/s 3.2 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 659.2 GFLOPS 25.6 GFLOPS


comments powered by Disqus