Winner
Nvidia GeForce 840M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 840M based on its gaming and benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 840M |
Released May, 2015
AMD Radeon R5 M330
- 955 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
6.4 Out of 10
by Doug-Crowthers (Apr, 2012)Combined with AMD's ZeroCore and Power Gating technology, the HD 7000M series is setting up to be a very power efficient platform.
VS
Released March, 2014
Nvidia GeForce 840M
- 1 GHz
- 1 GB DDR3
6.8 Out of 10
by Tim-Verry (Jun, 2013)These chips are still based on Kepler (600-series), but feature more CUDA cores, more memory, a wider memory bus, and faster clockspeeds.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M330 vs 840M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce 840MGPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly lower TDP | 18W | vs | 33W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 10,332 | vs | 5,972 | Around 75% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 879 | vs | 582 | More than 50% better PassMark score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,715.22 | vs | 1,557.22 | Around 2.5x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,029 MHz | vs | 955 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark06 score | 2,338 | vs | 1,659 | More than 40% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,124 MHz | vs | 1,030 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 159.36 frames/s | vs | -1 frames/s | More than 16025% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Higher thief framerate | 9.1 | vs | 5.1 | Around 80% higher thief framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,001 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 13.5 fps | vs | 8.2 fps | Around 65% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 840M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Thief
Battlefield 4
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 840M vs 740M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 920M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 850M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs 820M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 840M vs R7 M265 | ||
 | VS | |
| R5 M330 vs 920M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RTX 2080 Rev. A | ||
 | VS |  |
| $288 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $288 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $288 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
