Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920M based on its gaming and benchmarks.
See full details | Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 920M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7.5 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce 920MGPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Slightly lower TDP | 18W | vs | 33W | More than 45% lower TDP | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.92 | vs | 2,628.36 | Around 30% better T-Rex score | |||
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 9,003.5 | vs | 5,972 | More than 50% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Better face detection score | 8.36 mPixels/s | vs | -1 mPixels/s | More than 925% better face detection score | |||
Slightly more texture mapping units | 32 | vs | 20 | 12 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 9.6 | vs | 6.4 | Around 50% higher battlefield 4 framerate |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
660 vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
920MX vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
820M vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R5 M430 vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R5 M335 vs 920M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs R5 M330 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
RX 580 vs 1070 | ||