Winner
Nvidia GeForce 920MX
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce 920MX based on its benchmarks.
See full details Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce 920MX |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M330 vs 920MX among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Radeon R5 M330 vs the Nvidia GeForce 920MX. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,359.28 | vs | 2,628.36 | Around 30% better T-Rex score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 986 | vs | 582 | Around 70% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,072 MHz | vs | 955 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,176 MHz | vs | 1,030 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 11 | vs | 6.4 | More than 70% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Report a correction
