GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M330 vs G210M among Laptop GPUs under 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan and Cloud Gate Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 30 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

4.6

Overall Score

Winner
AMD Radeon R5 M330 

GPUBoss recommends the AMD Radeon R5 M330  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M330

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M330

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 2,628.36 vs 1,462.41 Around 80% better T-Rex score
Significantly higher clock speed 955 MHz vs 625 MHz Around 55% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 582 vs 204 More than 2.8x better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 512 MB 4x more memory
Better floating-point performance 659.2 GFLOPS vs 48 GFLOPS Around 13.8x better floating-point performance
Slightly higher texture rate 20.6 GTexel/s vs 5 GTexel/s More than 4x higher texture rate
More shading units 320 vs 16 304 more shading units
Slightly more texture mapping units 20 vs 8 12 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 900 MHz vs 800 MHz Around 15% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce G210M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce G210M

Report a correction

GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Nvidia GeForce G210M vs the AMD Radeon R5 M330.

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M330 vs GeForce G210M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M330
2,628.36
GeForce G210M
1,462.41

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus