GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M335 vs 950M among Laptop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M335

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M335

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,070 MHz vs 993 MHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Much better T-Rex score 3,361.16 vs 1,679.86 More than 2x better T-Rex score
Front view of GeForce GTX 950M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 950M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,237 vs 5,921 More than 3.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 102.9 fps vs 20.4 fps More than 5x higher diablo III framerate
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 14,227 vs 4,032 More than 3.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Better PassMark score 1,807 vs 554 More than 3.2x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark06 score 4,444 vs 1,784 Around 2.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 825 MHz More than 35% higher turbo clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,271 GFLOPS vs 684.8 GFLOPS More than 85% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 39.7 GTexel/s vs 21.4 GTexel/s More than 85% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 15.89 GPixel/s vs 8.56 GPixel/s More than 85% higher pixel rate
More shading units 640 vs 320 Twice as many shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 20 Twice as many texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Better face detection score 40.71 mPixels/s vs 14.54 mPixels/s More than 2.8x better face detection score
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 29.6 fps vs 7.8 fps More than 3.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher thief framerate 19.5 vs 5.2 3.8x higher thief framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M335 vs GeForce GTX 950M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
14.54 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 950M
40.71 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
120.35 frames/s
GeForce GTX 950M
369.32 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
117.92 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 950M
450.1 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
GeForce GTX 950M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
GeForce GTX 950M

Bioshock Infinite


comments powered by Disqus