GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of R5 M335 vs 960M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Radeon R5 M335

Reasons to consider the
AMD Radeon R5 M335

Report a correction
Slightly better manhattan score 3,112.94 vs 2,851.98 Around 10% better manhattan score
Front view of GeForce GTX 960M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 23,777.5 vs 5,921 More than 4x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 121.3 fps vs 20.4 fps Around 6x higher diablo III framerate
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 1,800 MHz More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 2,043 vs 554 Around 3.8x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark06 score 5,277 vs 1,784 Around 3x better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 80.2 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,176 MHz vs 825 MHz Around 45% higher turbo clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,404.2 GFLOPS vs 684.8 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 43.9 GTexel/s vs 21.4 GTexel/s More than 2x higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 17.55 GPixel/s vs 8.56 GPixel/s More than 2x higher pixel rate
Better face detection score 53.96 mPixels/s vs 14.54 mPixels/s Around 3.8x better face detection score
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.3 fps vs 7.8 fps More than 5.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher thief framerate 27.8 vs 5.2 More than 5.2x higher thief framerate
More shading units 640 vs 320 Twice as many shading units
More texture mapping units 40 vs 20 Twice as many texture mapping units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of Radeon R5 M335 vs GeForce GTX 960M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
14.54 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 960M
53.96 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
120.35 frames/s
GeForce GTX 960M
795.15 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
117.92 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 960M
580.96 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
3,361.16
GeForce GTX 960M
1,927.99

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Radeon R5 M335
3,112.94
GeForce GTX 960M
2,851.98

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus